At Eternity's Gate

At Eternity's Gate

[EXPRESS VIEW]

DVD - 2019
Average Rating:
Rate this:
17
Drawing upon actual correspondence left by Vincent Van Gogh--and a compelling central performance from Willem Dafoe--director Julian Schnabel delivered an evocative and dreamlike look into the tormented artist's troubled psyche during his turbulent final years in the South of France.
Publisher: [Canada] :, Elevation Pictures,, [2019]
Copyright Date: ©2018
Branch Call Number: DVD MOVIE AT E
Characteristics: 1 videodisc (111 minutes) : sound, colour ; 4 3/4 inches
digital,optical,surround,Dolby Digital 5.1,rda
video file,DVD video,region 1,rda

Opinion

From the critics


Community Activity

Comment

Add a Comment
r
RainbowRabbit
Jul 01, 2019

Vincent Van Gogh is a frequent subject of biographical films. This one is a bit slow and measured, but attempts to get at the person who would cut off his ear to give to a friend and would die of a shot wound, but not reveal how it happened. Such a lonely character, how can we ever get to know him. We can imagine him, and this the director - an artist - and the actor - an actor afterall - they do a decent job in making his madman approachable without being too romantic. This is not a romantic portrait by any means. Good job, guys. I did not like the music, oh well.

2
21221018293347
Jun 26, 2019

Maybe this movie would appeal to people who know the story of Van Gogh. I found the movie too fantasy filled and full of long segments of music without much action. I could not continue watching. I quickly lost interest.

b
Backgammon26
Jun 15, 2019

Surprisingly good.

p
PearlyKayAm1
Jun 15, 2019

Fairly good interpretation of van Gogh's descent into utter despair but the age discrepancy between star Willem Dafoe (63 years old) and artist van Gogh (died at age 37) was distracting. Willem Dafoe has visual similarities, but is far too old for the part.

h
hammer59
May 18, 2019

A vibrant triumphant portrayal of one of the most prolific and enigmatic Genius's ever born.
Defoe knocks this film out of the park in a convincing role of Vincent van Gogh, the painter from Holland who never sold a painting during his lifetime---but whose work sells for millions of dollars today. Do not be dissuaded by any negative reviews by the philistines down playing this masterpiece! Enjoy!!!

a
ADF1971
May 06, 2019

The actors/characters were good. Their ability was overshadowed by the music score and, while I get the desire to use the camera as an artistic outlet for the mental challenges of Van Gogh, the cinematography was put before the matter and distracted from the context. The story of Van Gogh is well known, the acting compelling, however the directorship did not permit you to feel engaged with the characters. Many other stories/films tell of Van Gogh in a far more appreciative manner.

s
scribby
May 05, 2019

Visually fascinating, often photographed with a split lens; hallucinatory, disturbing but beautiful; this is a portrait (not a biopic) of a painter, by a painter. Great acting by all involved, and most frames simply look like paintings. This is one of the few films I found interesting enough to watch the director's commentary all the way through.

h
harold2499
Apr 08, 2019

This movie is an insult to Vincent. Woulda, coulda, and shoulda been a great movie. The music was compared to a tinny piano playing chopsticks. The tempo was a slow as a tortoise. Too much time wasted on Vincent hiking, walking, running and climbing small mountains. It never really told the true artist Vincent was. Instead it focused on his mental problems.
Glad I didn't pay theatre prices. Dafoe did a marvelous acting role.
The photography was terrible with the camera moving all the time and zooming in and out. My eyes can't take this kind of movement. I found I was closing my eyes most of the time. A chimpanzee with a cell phone camera could do a better job with photographing.

d
doyoureadme
Apr 06, 2019

Julian Schnabel (beak, in German) sickens us with slow paced auto-indulgence, as if he can't decide whether he wants the audience to love Van Gogh or find him as insufferable as the residents of Arles do. He substitutes sporadic impulsivity in place of any semblance of a fluid story. The intentionally jerky camera work looks to have been done by a drunken toddler with a hand held device lacking a steadicam gimbal stabilizer, giving one nausea akin to sea-sickness, in what may have been intended to highlight a tired and clumsy notion of what schizophrenia must feel like. Not even Willem Dafoe's excellent turn could save this artless, tedious lack of creativity. A perfect example of the pervading trendy weirdness of people liking inept art with intoxicated fervor.

m
ms_mustard
Apr 06, 2019

intriguing and visually disturbing
certainly a different approach to van Gogh than Loving Vincent
tho no official diagnosis was ever made, van Gogh suffered from mental disturbance and that is the lens through which his story is told in this film - both visually and physically

I didn't find it easy to get into the rhythm of this film but I am glad I watched it

View All Comments

Age Suitability

Add Age Suitability

There are no age suitabilities for this title yet.

Summary

Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.

Notices

Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.

Quotes

Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Explore Further

Browse by Call Number

Subject Headings

  Loading...

Find it at NWPL

  Loading...
[]
[]
To Top