Brief History of Time

Brief History of Time

Book - 1998
Average Rating:
8
6
2
 …
Rate this:
Publisher: New York, NY : Bantam : 1998
ISBN: 9780553380163
Branch Call Number: 523.1 H314br
Characteristics: 212p. : ill

Opinion

From the critics


Community Activity

Comment

Add a Comment

b
burrakavita
Aug 07, 2017

I am a 6th grader, and I have came here after reading last book in the Accelerati Trilogy (Hawking's Hallway) by Neal Shusterman and Eric Elfman. I must say, I am very intrigued by all this space-time continuum and time travel and stuff like this. For people who love this book, I recommend you read the Accelerati trilogy. You will love it.

d
davidgaravito
Oct 31, 2016

 A Brief History of Time by Stephen Hawking is a book about of a history of the universe, for my opinion is something amazing this book, shows how the ideas of the human was changing that first start with  Aristotle who thought that the earth was stationary so the earth didn’t move and the planets, the sun and the stars was moving around the earth, and to finish Hawking with his big theory about blacks holes that it is something awesome. For me the most impact it was when I understood how the big ideas were changing  to understand better the world.
    From my point of view the best scientist has been Stephen Hawking, he is a scientist who everybody should admire because he is a disable person, but he is really smart, also he has the same respect that Albert Einstein, he has a real goal that he said “ My goal is simple. It is complete understanding of the universe, why it is as it is and why it exists at all”. In my opinion this “goal” is something unbelievable, this is why he is so smart but he has a problem or something that for me it isn't okay that he is atheist; Although,he wrote a letter where he told that God was always in the equations,It was my conclusion about his letter.
    The book A Brief History of Time let me feel without knowledge about this theme,   because in the book explain everything in the universe in my world specifically. I could discover something that I didn’t know, but I always keep asking me the same question.One part told about the blacks holes that  I don’t like just because our mathematics are excellent, but the technology of the humans can’t travel  to the galaxies to test all theories that we have it.

y
yo89999
Jun 22, 2016

This book was very enjoyable and introduced me easily to some of the hard concepts of modern physics

d
dwcole78
Aug 05, 2015

Note that it is on my completed list not my I understood it list

m
Mark Melnychuk
Jun 10, 2012

Hawkin's A Brief History of Time leaves many aspects of modern and classical physics only half explained. This is partly due to his decision to steer clear of even the simplest mathematics, not wanting to alienate a mathematically incompetent readership. The result is pretty unsatisfactory and explains the books notoriety as one of the most unread bestsellers. A much better popular science book, covering much the same ground, is Why Does E=mc² ? by Brian Cox and Jeff Forshaw.
After reading A Brief History of Time, one wonders whether Hawkin's standing in the field is as high as it seems. He doesn't even discuss the concept of gravity as curved space and that is a significant omission. Also, he merely offers tantilizing hints of the reality behind physical phenomena and nothing more. Some say he isn't so great and there are more than a few others that are just as great or greater. In our politically correct, mad society, it is no suprise that a physically-challenged physicist should get undue attention. Forget A Brief History of Time; read instead the alternative mentioned above.

m
Mark Melnychuk
Jun 10, 2012

Hawkin's A Brief History of Time leaves many aspects of modern and classical physics only half explained. This is partly due to his decision to steer clear of even the simplest mathematics, not wanting to alienate a mathematically incompetent readership. The result is pretty unsatisfactory and explains the books notoriety as one of the most unread bestsellers. A much better popular science book, covering much the same ground, is Why does E=mc² ? by Brian cox and Jeff Forshaw.
After reading A Brief History of Time, one wonders whether Hawkin's standing in the field is as high as it seems. He doesn't even discuss the concept of gravity as curved space and that is a significant omission. Also, he merely offers tantilizing hints of the reality behind physical phenomena and nothing more. Some say he isn't so great and there are more than a few others that are just as great or greater. In our politically correct, mad society, it is no suprise that a physically-challenged physicist should get undue attention. I know that there are no good physically-challenged, female Amerindian fiction writers because if there was one that was at least pretty good, there would be no end of hearing how she's the greatest thing since Shakepeare (like Jane Austen is now favourably compared with Shakepeare).
Forget A Brief History of Time; read instead the alternative mentioned above.

t
Teyfor8Wyoma
Jun 13, 2010

This book is very interesting and is explainined very simply, and has a very light and refreshing sense of humour to it.

m
mvincelli
Mar 07, 2010

This first half is much better than the second half.

Age Suitability

Add Age Suitability

b
burrakavita
Aug 07, 2017

burrakavita thinks this title is suitable for between the ages of 11 and 73

d
davidgaravito
Oct 31, 2016

davidgaravito thinks this title is suitable for between the ages of 99 and 10

y
yo89999
Jun 22, 2016

yo89999 thinks this title is suitable for All Ages

s
Sagarpp3
Jul 31, 2013

Sagarpp3 thinks this title is suitable for 11 years and over

j
Jian Feng Wang
May 29, 2013

Jian Feng Wang thinks this title is suitable for 10 years and over

t
Teyfor8Wyoma
Aug 25, 2010

Teyfor8Wyoma thinks this title is suitable for All Ages

Quotes

Add a Quote

y
yo89999
Jun 20, 2016

Some people never admit that they are wrong and continue to find new, and often mutually inconsistent, arguments to support their case - as Eddington did in opposing black hole theory. Others claim to have never really supported the view in the first place or, if they did, it was only to show that it was inconsistent. It seems to me much better and less confusing if you admit in print that you were wrong.

y
yo89999
Jun 20, 2016

We find ourselves in a bewildering world. We want to make sense of what we see around us and to ask: What is the nature of the universe? What is our place in it and where did it and we come from? Why is it the way it is?

Summary

Add a Summary

d
davidgaravito
Oct 31, 2016

 A Brief History of Time by Stephen Hawking is a book about of a history of the universe, for my opinion is something amazing this book, shows how the ideas of the human was changing that first start with  Aristotle who thought that the earth was stationary so the earth didn’t move and the planets,the sun and the stars was moving around the earth,and to finish Hawking with his big theory about blacks holes that it is something awesome. For me the most impact it was when I understood how the big ideas were changing  to understand better the world.
    From my point of view the best scientist has been Stephen Hawking, he is a scientist who everybody should admire because he is a disable person, but he is really smart, also he has the same respect that Albert Einstein, he has a real goal that he said “ My goal is simple. It is complete understanding of the universe, why it is as it is and why it exists at all”. In my opinion this “goal” is something unbelievable, this is why he is so smart but he has a problem or something that for me it isn't okay that he is atheist; Although,he wrote a letter where he told that God was always in the equations,It was my conclusion about his letter.
    The book A Brief History of Time let me feel without knowledge about this theme,   because in the book explain everything in the universe in my world specifically. I could discover something that I didn’t know, but I always keep asking me the same question.One part told about the blacks holes that  I don’t like just because our mathematics are excellent, but the technology of the humans can’t travel  to the galaxies to test all theories that we have it.

Notices

Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.

Explore Further

Browse by Call Number

Subject Headings

  Loading...

Find it at NWPL

  Loading...
[]
[]
To Top