What a disappointment! The first third of the book is fine. It was done in the style of Jane Austen and made me smile. But it goes downhill pretty drastically so that by the last quarter of the book I was just skimming it to see if anything important happened. It's going back to the library early. Don't waste your time.

very disappointing, not much of a mystery. Too much of the "action" happens in letters and "after the trial" information. Minimal tension. Good representation of Jane Austen's characters, but sometimes she almost seemed to make a caricature of them. Doesn't work as a mystery or a Jane Austen homage.

This is the more disappointing since PD James can definitely write. It may be possible that she is being too careful and too respectful of the Austen canon. However, despite the care taken to be faithful to the characters and style (and the interesting touches working in other Austen titles) there is little tension in the work. It's just a bit dull.

An enjoyable light read, PD James captures the sense and language of Austen. Not terribly suspenseful but I feel she does Austen better than most trying to cash in on Austen's popularity.

very disappointing - don't bother reading this - it is a waste of time

rather slow...of course we expect that

This book demonstrates what a great author Jane Austen was. As wonderful a mystery writer PD James is, she cannot come close. The book is a mystery involving Elizabeth and Fitzwilliam Darcy after their marriage. While supposedly a period piece, it is clear that this is not written by a 17th Century author. Very superficial. Very disappointing

This is not a Jane Austen novel, it is a P. D. James novel, and should be read (and judged) as such. It will likely be read by many who have not read Austen's masterpiece. As to be expected, James is masterful at limning the quotidien life and ethos of the period. There is an overreliance on exposition, and needless repitition, in what is less of a mystery than a crime novel. One does care what happens next, but this is not James at her best.

Kudos for the authentic Austen writing style but that's where it ends.

I think someone would enjoy this book more if they're not a big Austen fan. Unfortunately, I am & have great respect for the talents of James. But the two don't mix well. Austen was all about subtlety, the true story sometimes being read between the lines & illustrated with a described look or gesture. James writes excellent who-dunnits which requires much more overt dialogue & action. As a result, the book doesn't really resemble either of them. There is the language & proper behaviour of the day but this does not lend itself to a great murder mystery. Most of the time, it's too slow moving. When it does pick up, it makes the characters sometimes seem unnatural, unlike the personalities we know so well. I think James was very brave to make the attempt (I can't imagine a thriller by Austen) but these two authors have styles that are just too far apart.